|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02878nam a2200217 a 4500 |
001 |
555938 |
005 |
20171111230020.0 |
008 |
100201s2010 miu b 001 0 eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9780737747409 (hbk.)
|
040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|
050 |
|
|
|a KF4758
|b .S485 2010
|
082 |
|
|
|2 22
|a 342.7308/7
|
245 |
|
|
|a Sex discrimination /
|c Noël Merino, book editor.
|
260 |
|
|
|a Farmington Hills, MI :
|b Greenhaven Press,
|c c2010.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 190 p. ;
|c 24 cm.
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Issues on trial
|
504 |
1 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
505 |
1 |
|
|a Sex discrimination in military benefits -- Case overview: Frontiero v. Richardson (1973). The court's decision: differential treatment of men and women is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- The statute in question treating men and women differently is reasonable / Erwin N. Griswold, Harlington Wood Jr., Mark L. Evans -- The decision in Frontiero was a key step toward equality for women / Christine Basic -- The Frontiero decision helped women achieve equality in the military / Lory Manning -- The reasoning in Frontiero protecting women supports protection of homosexuals / Thomas B. Scheffey -- Striking down statutes requiring alimony only of men -- Case overview: Orr v. Orr (1979). The court's decision: legislation distributing benefits and burdens by gender is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: no sex discrimination exists for an individual who is not harmed / William H. Rehnquist -- Men receiving alimony still suffer stigmatization years after Orr / Anita Raghavan -- Women are increasingly paying alimony as equality requires / Betsy Schiffman -- Upholding affirmative action for working women -- Case overview: Johnson v. Transportation Agency (1987). The court's decision: taking account of sex in order to eliminate underrepresentation in employment is constitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: in employment, taking sex into account for any reason is sex discrimination / Antonin Scalia -- Brennanism / Daniel Seligman -- The relevance of Johnson for ad hoc affirmative action is unclear / Michael Starr and Adam J. Heft -- Validating limits on suing employers for sex discrimination -- Case overview: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007). The court's decision: filing for pay discrimination is subject to time limits / Samuel A. Alito Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: current pay disparities between men and women are acts of sex discrimination / Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- Ledbetter was not unjustly decided / Stuart Taylor Jr. -- Congress should overturn Ledbetter / Dahlia Lithwick -- The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act will create many problems / Andrew M. Grossman.
|
650 |
1 |
|
|a Sex discrimination
|x Law and legislation
|z United States
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Merino, No礬.
|x Cases
|
952 |
|
|
|a GrThPMO
|b 59b018736c5ad17d7e5ae39b
|c 952a
|d 9528
|e KF4758.S485 2010
|t 7
|x m
|z Books
|